Re: NODE_DATA without CONFIG_NUMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Horms wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:05:30AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> IMHO nodedata.h should provide alternative macros for non NUMA builds.
>> It seems silly to protect the include with #ifdef.
> 
> That is pretty much what I was thinking.
> But perhaps there is a reason for it.

My guess is the reason is lack of testing of all obscure configurations
:) That said, #ifdef'ing out a kernel include like that is almost always
wrong.

Cheers,
Jes



-- 
VGER BF report: U 0.500033
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux