On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 12:28:47AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Now, you're treating it as a fix, which is perfectly fine. For > > me, it's a 50-50 case. > > For me, this is a clear no-fix case as long as nobody really reported > problems (which I am not aware of). Also, looking at the Kconfig text, > it looks unlikely to me that this controller has been used with big > endian systems. Or? Yeah! That was my first thought, but because this was reported by LKP (which I respect more than other code analyzers) as a potential issue, I was on the 50-50. I still agree that the patch is correct because there's a hanging comment. So, either remove the comment or go with Athrva's approach. Urgh, I'm just leaving things as they are :-) Andi
