On 9/30/24 17:45, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
On 9/29/2024 12:06 PM, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
On 9/26/2024 3:58 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
Hello Manikanta.
On 9/26/24 06:43, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
In existing socs, I2C serial engine is sourced from XO (19.2MHz).
Where as in IPQ5424, I2C serial engine is sourced from GPLL0 (32MHz).
The existing map table is based on 19.2MHz. This patch incorporate
the clock map table to derive the SCL clock from the 32MHz source
clock frequency.
Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
- Dropped IPQ5424 from the commit title
- Added else part to assign geni_i2c_clk_map_19p2mhz to itr
- Dropped MHZ macro and used HZ_PER_MHZ macro
- Expanded SE to serial engine
- Added the reason for 32MHz clock in commit message
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
index 212336f724a6..22f2a0d83641 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/soc/qcom/geni-se.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/units.h>
#define SE_I2C_TX_TRANS_LEN 0x26c
#define SE_I2C_RX_TRANS_LEN 0x270
@@ -146,18 +147,30 @@ struct geni_i2c_clk_fld {
* clk_freq_out = t / t_cycle
* source_clock = 19.2 MHz
*/
-static const struct geni_i2c_clk_fld geni_i2c_clk_map[] = {
+static const struct geni_i2c_clk_fld geni_i2c_clk_map_19p2mhz[] = {
{KHZ(100), 7, 10, 11, 26},
{KHZ(400), 2, 5, 12, 24},
{KHZ(1000), 1, 3, 9, 18},
};
+/* source_clock = 32 MHz */
+static const struct geni_i2c_clk_fld geni_i2c_clk_map_32mhz[] = {
+ {KHZ(100), 7, 14, 18, 40},
+ {KHZ(400), 4, 3, 11, 20},
+ {KHZ(1000), 4, 3, 6, 15},
+};
Please double check the values.
This is what I get:
* for 100KHz: 32000000 / (40 * 7) ~ 114286, apparently 32000000 / (40 * 8) would
be a better fit, however it's unclear what would be proper t_high / t_low values,
* for 400KHz: it seems good,
* for 1000KHz: 32000000 / (15 * 4) ~ 533333, which is almost 1/2 of the wanted
bus frequency, so this one looks very wrong.
Do you have any ideas how to get better bus frequency settings?
Thanks for pointing this out.
I will double check and get back with the proper data.
Thanks & Regards,
Manikanta.
Based on Qualcomm's internal hardware programming guide, below values need to be used for 100K & 1000K.
{KHZ(100), 8, 14, 18, 40}
{KHZ(1000), 2, 3, 6, 15}
I will update these values in next version.
Great! These values make much more sence, thank you.
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
