On 9/29/2024 12:06 PM, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>
>
> On 9/26/2024 3:58 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hello Manikanta.
>>
>> On 9/26/24 06:43, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
>>> In existing socs, I2C serial engine is sourced from XO (19.2MHz).
>>> Where as in IPQ5424, I2C serial engine is sourced from GPLL0 (32MHz).
>>>
>>> The existing map table is based on 19.2MHz. This patch incorporate
>>> the clock map table to derive the SCL clock from the 32MHz source
>>> clock frequency.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Dropped IPQ5424 from the commit title
>>> - Added else part to assign geni_i2c_clk_map_19p2mhz to itr
>>> - Dropped MHZ macro and used HZ_PER_MHZ macro
>>> - Expanded SE to serial engine
>>> - Added the reason for 32MHz clock in commit message
>>>
>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
>>> index 212336f724a6..22f2a0d83641 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c
>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>> #include <linux/soc/qcom/geni-se.h>
>>> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>> +#include <linux/units.h>
>>> #define SE_I2C_TX_TRANS_LEN 0x26c
>>> #define SE_I2C_RX_TRANS_LEN 0x270
>>> @@ -146,18 +147,30 @@ struct geni_i2c_clk_fld {
>>> * clk_freq_out = t / t_cycle
>>> * source_clock = 19.2 MHz
>>> */
>>> -static const struct geni_i2c_clk_fld geni_i2c_clk_map[] = {
>>> +static const struct geni_i2c_clk_fld geni_i2c_clk_map_19p2mhz[] = {
>>> {KHZ(100), 7, 10, 11, 26},
>>> {KHZ(400), 2, 5, 12, 24},
>>> {KHZ(1000), 1, 3, 9, 18},
>>> };
>>> +/* source_clock = 32 MHz */
>>> +static const struct geni_i2c_clk_fld geni_i2c_clk_map_32mhz[] = {
>>> + {KHZ(100), 7, 14, 18, 40},
>>> + {KHZ(400), 4, 3, 11, 20},
>>> + {KHZ(1000), 4, 3, 6, 15},
>>> +};
>>
>> Please double check the values.
>>
>> This is what I get:
>> * for 100KHz: 32000000 / (40 * 7) ~ 114286, apparently 32000000 / (40 * 8) would
>> be a better fit, however it's unclear what would be proper t_high / t_low values,
>> * for 400KHz: it seems good,
>> * for 1000KHz: 32000000 / (15 * 4) ~ 533333, which is almost 1/2 of the wanted
>> bus frequency, so this one looks very wrong.
>>
>> Do you have any ideas how to get better bus frequency settings?
>>
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> I will double check and get back with the proper data.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Manikanta.
>
Based on Qualcomm's internal hardware programming guide, below values need to be used for 100K & 1000K.
{KHZ(100), 8, 14, 18, 40}
{KHZ(1000), 2, 3, 6, 15}
I will update these values in next version.
Thanks & Regards,
Manikanta.
