On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 9:16 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 04:09:26PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 05:00:05PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
> > > +static struct device_node *of_get_child_regulator(struct device_node *parent,
> > > + const char *prop_name)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device_node *regnode = NULL;
>
> > > + struct device_node *child = NULL;
>
> Btw, redundant assignment here, as child will be assigned anyway AFAIR.
>
> > > + for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) {
> >
> > > + regnode = of_parse_phandle(child, prop_name, 0);
> > > + if (!regnode) {
> > > + regnode = of_get_child_regulator(child, prop_name);
> > > + if (regnode)
> > > + goto err_node_put;
> > > + } else {
> > > + goto err_node_put;
> > > + }
> >
> > I know this is just a move of the existing code, but consider negating the
> > conditional and have something like
> >
> > regnode = of_parse_phandle(child, prop_name, 0);
> > if (regnode)
> > goto err_node_put;
> >
> > regnode = of_get_child_regulator(child, prop_name);
> > if (regnode)
> > goto err_node_put;
> >
Looks like Mark already merged this one. I'll send extra patches to clean
this up later.
ChenYu
> > > + }
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +
> > > +err_node_put:
> > > + of_node_put(child);
> > > + return regnode;
> > > +}
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
