> > +A **target** chip is a node that responds to communications when addressed > > +by the controller. In Linux it is called a **client**. Client drivers are kept > > Are we continuing to use client instead of local target and remote target? Nope, "client" is just the Linux word for "target". Like "adapter" for "controller". Historic legacy. So, in a way "local client" and "remote client" would also work to emphasize the distinction. This document so far only talks about "remote targets". I noticed this a few hours ago and concluded that another paragraph needs to be added explaining that Linux can be a target as well. And that this is called a "local target" while the other ones are "remote targets". Makes sense?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
