On 4/26/24 01:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 25/04/2024 23:36, Eddie James wrote:
Document the FSI Hub Controller CFAM engine.
Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/fsi/ibm,hub-fsi-controller.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,hub-fsi-controller.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,hub-fsi-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,hub-fsi-controller.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d96d777d4d9f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/ibm,hub-fsi-controller.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/fsi/ibm,hub-fsi-controller.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: IBM FSI-attached FSI Hub Controller
+
+maintainers:
+ - Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
+description: |
Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.
Ack.
+ The FSI Hub Controller is an FSI controller, providing a number of FSI links,
+ located on a CFAM. Therefore this node will always be a child of an FSI CFAM
+ node.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ enum:
+ - ibm,hub-fsi-controller
Again, is it for specific chip? SoC? Aren't you using generic
compatibles (not allowed)?
This one is fairly universally supported on FSI (any POWER chip will
have it) so I didn't add a specific chip... Should i? Do you mean
generic compatibles are not allowed? How generic do you mean?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
