Hi Krzysztof, On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:22:38AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 20/12/2023 00:25, Andi Shyti wrote: > > Hi, > > > >>> I personally would like to see it accepted but it seems there are > >>> objections to this approach. I've yet to come up with anything better to > >>> offer as an alternative. > >> > >> I see. Thanks for the heads up! > > > > I'm also inclined to have this merged. A real fix might take > > time. > > NAK > > If you intend to merge it, then please carry: > > Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> ehehe... too much drama here :-) I know you nacked this patch and of course won't be taken anywhere. I was actually referring to Chris previous patch rather than this one. Andi > The patchset is wrong and made of wrong reasons. It claimed GPIO cannot > be shared, which is simply not true. > > > > > Myself I have developed a prototype for what has been discussed > > with Krzysztof, but I don't know how much time it will take to > > get things done. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
