On 20/12/2023 00:25, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi, > >>> I personally would like to see it accepted but it seems there are >>> objections to this approach. I've yet to come up with anything better to >>> offer as an alternative. >> >> I see. Thanks for the heads up! > > I'm also inclined to have this merged. A real fix might take > time. NAK If you intend to merge it, then please carry: Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> The patchset is wrong and made of wrong reasons. It claimed GPIO cannot be shared, which is simply not true. > > Myself I have developed a prototype for what has been discussed > with Krzysztof, but I don't know how much time it will take to > get things done. Best regards, Krzysztof
