On 14/12/2023 16:39, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 4:52 AM Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Enable the cmu-peric0 clock controller. It feeds USI and I3c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi
>> index 9747cb3fa03a..d0b0ad70c6ba 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/google/gs101.dtsi
>> @@ -339,6 +339,18 @@ ppi_cluster2: interrupt-partition-2 {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> + cmu_peric0: clock-controller@10800000 {
>> + compatible = "google,gs101-cmu-peric0";
>> + reg = <0x10800000 0x4000>;
>> + #clock-cells = <1>;
>> + clocks = <&ext_24_5m>,
>> + <&cmu_top CLK_DOUT_CMU_PERIC0_BUS>,
>> + <&cmu_top CLK_DOUT_CMU_PERIC0_IP>;
>> + clock-names = "oscclk",
>> + "dout_cmu_peric0_bus",
>
> I'd pull this line to the above line. Other than that:
>
No, it's fine. If clocks span over multiple lines (one clock per line),
the names should follow in general. It's easier to read and match entries.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
