On 26.10.2023 19:26, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Wolfram, can we take this in i2c? Otherwise this will take two >> release rounds to get in. > > In general, I can, no problem. But there is still on-going discussion > regarding patch 2. So, I will wait for a conclusion there. I am not > familiar enough with ACPI to have an own opinion about that topic. > Not sure whether the discussion is ongoing, my impression is it stalled. Rafael as ACPI maintainer thinks the helper makes sense and therefore acked it. Andi shares this opinion, and others like Jean have doubts. For sure I won't receive a Turing award for this helper, but it's IMO better than the cascaded macros.
