(resend as plain text) On 27/10/23 00:15, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> + reset-gpios: >> + description: >> + GPIO pin providing a common reset for all downstream devices. This GPIO >> + will be asserted then released before the downstream devices are probed. > How about renaming this to "bus-reset-gpios"? > > Reason: When I read "reset-gpios", then I assume the device itself will > be reset. In this case, the Marvell I2C controller. Some I2C mux devices > and PCA9564 already use the property like I described. I don't have an objection to "bus-reset-gpios" it would be trivial for me to spin a v5 with the naming changed if everyone is in agreement (given my timezone I might just send out a v5 with this change and then it can be argued whether to apply v4 or v5).
