On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 02:33:07PM +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 7/26/23 00:45, Andi Shyti wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:30:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > > -int i2c_dw_acpi_configure(struct device *device) > > > +static void i2c_dw_acpi_do_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, struct device *device) > > Because of this dual dev pointer obscurity which is cleaned in the next > patch and Andi's comment below in my opinion it makes sense to combine > patches 1 and 2. Besides that these 2 are logically slightly different, the changes don't drop the duality here. And there is also the other patch at the end of the series that makes the below disappear. Not sure that any of these would be the best approach (Git commit is cheap, maintenance and backporting might be harder). So, ideas are welcome! ... > > > +int i2c_dw_acpi_configure(struct device *device) > > > > I was about to ask you why are we keeping this int, but then I > > saw that you are making it void in the next patch :) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
