On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 23:25 +0200, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 05:32:42PM +0200, wsa@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > I think the patch is correct and I will ack it: > > > > > > Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > I think, though, that this needs a proper fix and testing, in > > > order to cover all the possible combinations. The scenario you > > > highlighted is indeed one, but not only, potential situation that > > > could arise. > > > > > > Can I just ask you to write a bit more in the comment to > > > highlight the possible failure? > > > > I tend to apply it to for-current because it improves the > > situation. > > Further improvements could be made incrementally? D'accord > > everyone? > > > > OK with that! > > Thanks, > Andi Just checking on this patch, was it merged? It shows accepted in Patchwork, but I'm not seeing it in the Git tree. -- Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@xxxxxxxxxx>
