> I think the patch is correct and I will ack it: > > Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I think, though, that this needs a proper fix and testing, in > order to cover all the possible combinations. The scenario you > highlighted is indeed one, but not only, potential situation that > could arise. > > Can I just ask you to write a bit more in the comment to > highlight the possible failure? I tend to apply it to for-current because it improves the situation. Further improvements could be made incrementally? D'accord everyone?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
