On 18. 11. 22, 23:45, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
I wonder why -- is this a new approach to probe functions? Or is only
i2c affected? And why? Could you point to the commit introducing and
describing the change in the i2c core?
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
index 39f92eb1e698..8412b25eac86 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sc16is7xx.c
@@ -1665,9 +1665,9 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("spi:sc16is7xx");
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_SC16IS7XX_I2C
-static int sc16is7xx_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
- const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+static int sc16is7xx_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
{
+ const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(i2c);
const struct sc16is7xx_devtype *devtype;
struct regmap *regmap;
@@ -1708,7 +1708,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver sc16is7xx_i2c_uart_driver = {
.name = SC16IS7XX_NAME,
.of_match_table = sc16is7xx_dt_ids,
},
- .probe = sc16is7xx_i2c_probe,
+ .probe_new = sc16is7xx_i2c_probe,
.remove = sc16is7xx_i2c_remove,
.id_table = sc16is7xx_i2c_id_table,
};
thanks,
--
js