On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 08:00:00PM -0600, Raul Rangel wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 7:00 PM Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 05:15:37PM -0600, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> > > Device tree already has a mechanism to pass the wake_irq. It does this
> > > by looking for the wakeup-source property and setting the
> > > I2C_CLIENT_WAKE flag. This CL adds the ACPI equivalent. It uses at the
> > > ACPI GpioInt wake flag to determine if the interrupt can be used to wake
> > > the system. Previously the i2c drivers had to make assumptions and
> > > blindly enable the wake IRQ. This can cause spurious wake events. e.g.,
> > > If there is a device with an Active Low interrupt and the device gets
> > > powered off while suspending, the interrupt line will go low since it's
> > > no longer powered and wake the system. For this reason we should respect
> > > the board designers wishes and honor the wake bit defined on the
> > > GpioInt.
> > >
> > > This change does not cover the ACPI Interrupt or IRQ resources.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 8 ++++++--
> > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h | 4 ++--
> > > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> > > index c762a879c4cc6b..cfe82a6ba3ef28 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
> > > @@ -182,12 +182,13 @@ static int i2c_acpi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> > > /**
> > > * i2c_acpi_get_irq - get device IRQ number from ACPI
> > > * @client: Pointer to the I2C client device
> > > + * @wake_capable: Set to 1 if the IRQ is wake capable
> > > *
> > > * Find the IRQ number used by a specific client device.
> > > *
> > > * Return: The IRQ number or an error code.
> > > */
> > > -int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > +int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client, int *wake_capable)
> > > {
> > > struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(&client->dev);
> > > struct list_head resource_list;
> > > @@ -196,6 +197,9 @@ int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct i2c_client *client)
> > >
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> > >
> > > + if (wake_capable)
> > > + *wake_capable = 0;
> > > +
> > > ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
> > > i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
> >
>
>
> > You also need to handle "Interrupt(..., ...AndWake)" case here. I would
> > look into maybe defining
> >
> > #define IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKECAPABLE (1<<6)
> >
> > in include/linux/ioport.h and plumbing it through from ACPI layer.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> AFAIK the Intel (Not 100% certain) and AMD IO-APIC's can't actually
> wake a system from suspend/suspend-to-idle. It requires either a GPE
> or GPIO controller to wake the system. This is the reason I haven't
> pushed patches to handle the Interrupt/IRQ resource. Can anyone
> confirm?
I've heard there are ARM ACPI systems...
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
