> > I think the proper fix would be naming the I2C client after the actually > > matched compatible property, and not after the first one? I am a bit > > afraid of regressions when we change that, however... > > That would be the right way indeed. I have the same concern regarding > regressions though. Is it worth a try to see what could break ? Sure! Only problem: Patches welcome(tm) or I put it on my to-do-list(tm) ;)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
