On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 11:20:54AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > My point is that this patch shouldn't be needed. I'd like if the I2C > > core could get the driver data from the i2c_device_id table instead of > > duplicating it in the of_device_id. This isn't possible today as > > i2c_match_id() doesn't have the fallback mechanism that OF matching has. > > I think the proper fix would be naming the I2C client after the actually > matched compatible property, and not after the first one? I am a bit > afraid of regressions when we change that, however... That would be the right way indeed. I have the same concern regarding regressions though. Is it worth a try to see what could break ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
