> thank you for applying the fixes, 1/9 and 9/9 are also good to be applied > for-next, there is no dependency on vbus-supply, so I would appreciate, if > you take two more changes. Done now. > As you suggested I'd start working on a generic support of such an optional > bus supplier property, I believe at the moment everything is quite clear, > I'll start from testing the previous solution, however my preference is > to connect regulator on/off to master controller pm ops rather than slave > pm ops. Additionally I am not quite satisfied with 'vbus-supply' name, Did I get this right? You want to reimplement bus regulator handling in the bus driver when we already have pending patches to add it to the I2C core?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
