> Thanks, my comments below.
>
> > Add device_irq_get_byname() to get an interrupt by name from both the
> > ACPI table and the Device Tree.
>
> This needs to be clarified (it's not and, but or), what about:
>
> Add device_irq_get_byname() to get an interrupt by name from either
> ACPI table or Device Tree whichever has it.
Does 'whichever has it' mean a bit different here? Would it be good like this -?
Add fwnode_irq_get_byname() to get an interrupt by name from either
ACPI table or Device Tree, whichever is used for enumeration.
Okay with the other comments.
Thanks,
Akhil
