> we'd hit the 100us timeout in the poll). But I see no evidence of that > actually happening (and no idea what arbitration lost means w.r.t i2c). On a bus with multiple masters, it means the other master has won the arbitration because the address it wants to talk to contains more 0 bits. > I don't know that there is a maximum clock stretch time (we certainly > know there are misbehaving devices that hold SCL low forever). The SMBUS > protocol adds some timeouts but as far as I know i2c says nothing about > how long a remote device can hold SCL. The above is all correct. Even with the unclear situation about the 100us, I think this should go to for-current soon, right?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
