>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2021 1:22 PM
>To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx>; D, Lakshmi Sowjanya
><lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Senthil, Bala <bala.senthil@xxxxxxxxx>; N, Pandith
><pandith.n@xxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: designware-pci: Add support for Fast Mode
>Plus and High Speed Mode
>
>On 11/29/21 6:56 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 04:05:51PM +0530, lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx
>wrote:
>>> From: Lakshmi Sowjanya D <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Add support to configure HCNT, LCNT values for Fast Mode Plus and
>>> High Speed Mode.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Sowjanya D <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Applied to for-next, thanks!
>>
>>> + u32 fp_lcnt;
>>> + u32 hs_lcnt;
>>> u32 sda_hold;
>>
>> Short question unrelated to this patch. Why are all these u32...
>>
>>> dev->ss_hcnt = cfg->ss_hcnt;
>>> dev->fs_hcnt = cfg->fs_hcnt;
>>
>> ... and the ones in dev are u16? Wouldn't it be easier if they all had
>> the same type?
>>
>True, only sda_hold(_time) is u32 and other timing parameters are u16.
>
>Lakshmi: Would you like to send a patch fixing this and get more contributions
>to the driver :-)
Thanks Wolfram and Jarkko,
Sure. I will send a patch fixing it.
Thanks,
Lakshmi
>
>Originally this discrepancy was introduced 2014 by the commit 8efd1e9ee3bd
>("i2c: designware-pci: set ideal HCNT, LCNT and SDA hold time value").
>
>Jarkko
