On 2021-11-21 21:22:47 +0100, Sven Peter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021, at 18:15, Janne Grunau wrote:
> > The intention was to have a SoC-specific and base compatible string
> > to allow forward compatibility and SoC specific quirks,
> >
> > Fixes: df7c4a8c1b47 ("dt-bindings: i2c: Add Apple I2C controller bindings")
> > Signed-off-by: Janne Grunau <j@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> Yeah, this should've been "apple,t8103-i2c", "apple,i2c" all along :/
> Given that we have no i2c nodes in the dts yet and that this binding was
> only added for -rc1 I think it's fine to just drop "apple,t8103-i2c"
> here instead of marking it as deprecated and keeping it around forever
> if Mark Kettenis also agrees.
>
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> > index 22fc8483256f..f1cb96c08212 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml
> > @@ -20,9 +20,10 @@ allOf:
> >
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > - enum:
> > - - apple,t8103-i2c
> > - - apple,i2c
> > + items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - apple,t8103-i2c
> > + - const: apple,i2c
>
> Nit: the enum makes sense once we add t6000-i2c but right now
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> items:
> - const: apple,t8103-i2c
> - const: apple,i2c
>
> also works and look a bit less weird.
I split it from change which in addition added "apple,t6000-i2c" as
second enum value. I have no strong preference but the weirdness will
hopefully vanish soon.
Janne
