On 21-11-19 08:17:11, Alexander Stein wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 18.11.2021 um 19:04 -0600 schrieb Rob Herring: > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 07:46:55PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > > Add i.MX8DXL lpuart compatible to the bindings documentation. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa < > > > abel.vesa@xxxxxxx > > > > > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml | 4 ++++ > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl- > > > lpuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl- > > > lpuart.yaml > > > index dc1f0e07cbd4..fa8a602ccb22 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > > @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ properties: > > > - items: > > > - const: fsl,imx8qm-lpuart > > > - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart > > > + - items: > > > + - const: fsl,imx8dxl-lpuart > > > + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart > > > + - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart > > > > I'm confused why 8dxl is compatible with 7ulp, but 8qm is not? From > > the > > driver, it looks like the difference is clocks. > > There is a difference between 8qm and 7ulp regarding the clocks. Are > they still considered compatible? Depending on the answer [1] might not > be the correct solution for earlycon regression on 8qm. > In NXP's tree, they are not compatible. See here: https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/linux-imx/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qm-ss-dma.dtsi?h=lf-5.10.y#n9 > Best regards, > Alexander > > [1] > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2021-November/696770.html > >
