On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:42:30PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:18:21AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:39:28 +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > > On 11/10/21 7:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 04:10:32PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: ... > > > >> + * Clear remaining irq sources: Completion of last command, errors > > > >> + * and the SMB_ALERT signal. SMB_ALERT status is set after signal > > > >> + * assertion independently is the interrupt generation blocked or not > > > > > > > > is --> if ? > > > > > > hmm, I don't know which one is correct or neither. Or should it be > > > something like "independently of whether the interrupt generation is > > > blocked or not"? Grammar polices, please help me :-) > > > > ... independently of the interrupt generation being blocked or not. > > > > Sounds better? > > > > (I think your "of whether" variant is grammatically correct too, if you > > prefer that.) > > For the sake of bikeshedding :-) I lean to "whether" variant, because I think s/"whether"/"of whether"/ > the determiner usage is decreasing over time, while its presence makes language > richer. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
