Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: i801: Fix interrupt storm from SMB_ALERT signal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:39:28 +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 11/10/21 7:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 04:10:32PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:  
> >>  	/*
> >> -	 * Clear irq sources and report transaction result.
> >> +	 * Clear remaining irq sources: Completion of last command, errors  
> >> +	 * and the SMB_ALERT signal. SMB_ALERT status is set after signal
> >> +	 * assertion independently is the interrupt generation blocked or not  
> > 
> > is --> if ?
>
> hmm, I don't know which one is correct or neither. Or should it be 
> something like "independently of whether the interrupt generation is 
> blocked or not"? Grammar polices, please help me :-)

... independently of the interrupt generation being blocked or not.

Sounds better?

(I think your "of whether" variant is grammatically correct too, if you
prefer that.)

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support



[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux