> Yes I do care. Apparently I wasn't Cc'd on that thread so I wasn't even > aware that patch existed. It would be very nice if you could bump the > thread to me (unless there's a way to retrieve it from patchwork that I > didn't find?) Sadly, I can't send the whole thread. I thought a had a local archive collected via gmane, but it seems this is not as complete as I hoped for :( You can download the patch itself as mbox, however. Check the upper right corner of the patchwork page. Or search for "mbox". > If we only want *one* I2C block read at a specified offset then i2cget > seems more appropriate indeed. I don't have a clear opinion here. On the one hand, if we want just one block read, this is more a "get" than a "dump". On the other hand, i2cdump already has a range-parameter. So, from a user perspective, keeping i2cget to single values and update the range parameter in i2cdump might be least confusing?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
