On 04/06/2021 15:33, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 03:09:43PM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote: >> On 04/06/2021 14:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 11:40:05PM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote: >>>> Add a function to verify that a given acpi_resource represents an IO >>>> type GPIO resource, and return it if so. >>> I would rephrase this to something like: >>> >>> "Add a function to verify that a given ACPI resource represents a GpioIo() type >>> of resource, and return it if so." >>> >>> I can amend when applying to my branch. >>> >> That wording is perfectly fine by me > These two patches (with mentioned amendments) pushed to my review and testing > queue, thanks! > > I'll send PR next week to all stakeholders. > Great - thanks very much!
