On Tue, 16 Mar 2021, Jonas Mark (BT-FIR/ENG1-Grb) wrote: > Hi Lee, > > > Code looks good to me now, thanks. > > > > However, this doesn't look like it would pass checkpatch. > > > > Have you tried to build with W=1 and checkpatch? > > Yes, we used checkpatch.pl. > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-mfd-da9063-Support-SMBus-and-I2C-mode.v5 > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 25 lines checked > > 0001-mfd-da9063-Support-SMBus-and-I2C-mode.v5 has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. > > Using the option --strict we get a check hint that the broken line of the regmap_clear_bits() is not aligned. We tried but were not able to make the tool happy. This matches our experience with this check hint and previous patches. > > Also compiling Linux 5.10.14 with our patch and W=1 does not yield a warning. FYI, you should be using -next for upstream development. > $ make W=1 > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh > CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh > CHK include/generated/compile.h > CC [M] drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.o > LD [M] drivers/mfd/da9063.o > Kernel: arch/arm/boot/Image is ready > Kernel: arch/arm/boot/zImage is ready > MODPOST Module.symvers > LD [M] drivers/mfd/da9063.ko -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
