Hi Andy
On 22/02/2021 13:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 3:12 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The acpi_walk_dep_device_list() is not as generalisable as its name
>> implies, serving only to decrement the dependency count for each
>> dependent device of the input. Extend the function to instead accept
>> a callback which can be applied to all the dependencies in acpi_dep_list.
>> Replace all existing calls to the function with calls to a wrapper, passing
>> a callback that applies the same dependency reduction.
> The code looks okay to me, if it was the initial idea, feel free to add
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Thank you!
>> + */
>> +void acpi_dev_flag_dependency_met(acpi_handle handle)
>> +{
> Since it's acpi_dev_* namespace, perhaps it should take struct acpi_device here?
I can do this, but I avoided it because in most of the uses in the
kernel currently there's no struct acpi_device, they're just passing
ACPI_HANDLE(dev) instead, so I'd need to get the adev with
ACPI_COMPANION() in each place. It didn't seem worth it...but happy to
do it if you'd prefer it that way?
