> > Also, this driver has no dedicated maintainer. Is there someone up for > > this task? There is probably little to do and it will speed up patch > > acceptance because I pick patches once the driver maintainer is happy. > > > > I think it falls under the 'TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT' wildcard (Thierry > and Jon). Do we need a more specific maintainer entry? > > If it's helpful to Thierry and Jon, I guess I could pick it up. I am fine with both. I'd just like a line "F: drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra-bpmp.c" somewhere in MAINTAINERS. If that's in Tegra architecture, also good. However, i2c-tegra.c already has a dedicated entry and spreading the work avoids bottlenecks, so I think it might be the better option. But I'll leave it to you guys. In any case, thanks for volunteering!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
