On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 9:39 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I think we might be overly complicating things. IMHO the series as is > > with the "i2c_" prefix removed from the flags introduced would be > > reusable as is for any other subsystem that needs it. Of course, for > > now, the handling of the flag would remain implemented only in the I2C > > subsystem. > > Just to be clear: you are suggesting to remove "i2c" from the DSD > binding "i2c-allow-low-power-probe". And you are not talking about > moving I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE to struct device_driver? I > recall the latter has been NACKed by gkh so far. > I'd also drop "I2C_" from "I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE", but all the implementation would remain where it is in the code. IOW, I'm just suggesting a naming change to avoid proliferating duplicate flags of the same meaning across subsystems.
