On 08. 09. 20 16:04, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 9/7/20 10:51 AM, Raviteja Narayanam wrote: > > [...] > >>> Is this dynamic/standard mode switching what is already in the downstream >>> xilinx kernel tree ? >>> >>> I think we should fix what is already upstream first, and only then add more >>> complexity. >> >> Yes, agreed. But, that would be a hardware fix in the future IP release. Since we have >> to support existing IP versions, we are planning to upstream the standard mode >> and based on the DT property (IP version), we will switch. > > Is the dynamic mode addition be backported to stable as well ? > It is a lot of code, so I have a feeling that would be difficult. Let's see when that changes are available. > Maybe it would be better to mark the xiic driver as broken until the > hardware is fixed ? I don't have a preference here. Wolfram: What do you think? Thanks, Michal
