On 9/7/20 10:51 AM, Raviteja Narayanam wrote: [...] >> Is this dynamic/standard mode switching what is already in the downstream >> xilinx kernel tree ? >> >> I think we should fix what is already upstream first, and only then add more >> complexity. > > Yes, agreed. But, that would be a hardware fix in the future IP release. Since we have > to support existing IP versions, we are planning to upstream the standard mode > and based on the DT property (IP version), we will switch. Is the dynamic mode addition be backported to stable as well ? It is a lot of code, so I have a feeling that would be difficult. Maybe it would be better to mark the xiic driver as broken until the hardware is fixed ?