On 8/12/20 5:12 PM, Bingbu Cao wrote:
>
>
> On 8/10/20 10:27 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> Tell ACPI device PM code that the driver supports the device being in a
>> low power state when the driver's probe function is entered.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/i2c/ov5670.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5670.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5670.c
>> index f26252e35e08d..1f75b888d2a18 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5670.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5670.c
>> @@ -2456,6 +2456,7 @@ static int ov5670_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>> struct ov5670 *ov5670;
>> const char *err_msg;
>> u32 input_clk = 0;
>> + bool low_power;
>> int ret;
>>
>> device_property_read_u32(&client->dev, "clock-frequency", &input_clk);
>> @@ -2472,11 +2473,14 @@ static int ov5670_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>> /* Initialize subdev */
>> v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&ov5670->sd, client, &ov5670_subdev_ops);
>>
>> - /* Check module identity */
>> - ret = ov5670_identify_module(ov5670);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - err_msg = "ov5670_identify_module() error";
>> - goto error_print;
>> + low_power = acpi_dev_state_low_power(&client->dev);
>> + if (!low_power) {
>> + /* Check module identity */
>> + ret = ov5670_identify_module(ov5670);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + err_msg = "ov5670_identify_module() error";
>> + goto error_print;
>> +
>
> Sakari, thanks for your patch.
> one question - With this change, there will be no chance for driver to guarantee
> that the camera sensor plugged in is the camera that the matched driver actually
> can drive until try to streaming the camera, so is it necessary to return
> appropriate error in .s_stream ops to notify user it is not the hardware that
> current driver can drive? if no other better way.
Sakari, please ignore my previous comment, it is not related to this change. I
see the sub device open is caused by v4l_id program from udev.
>
--
Best regards,
Bingbu Cao
