Hi Qiushi, On 13. 07. 20 21:41, Qiushi Wu wrote: > Hi Michal, > I think multiple previous patches also fixed similar problems, such as > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2404751/ > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg2227849.html > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/patch/20200520095148.10995-1-dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > But recently, people are discussing reimplementing > function pm_runtime_get_sync(), because it often misguides users and > introducing bugs. > So at this time point, I'm not sure if we should fix this issue in the > current version or wait for the new implementation of this API. : ) If we apply this patch then it needs to be reverted when API is fixed. Is there any timeline mentioned? If this will take some time I am fine with applying this patch. Thanks, Michal
