On 6/12/20 12:31 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:21:13PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:56:04AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:29:41AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:05:17AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:46:42PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> If interrupt comes early (could be triggered with CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ),
>>>>>
>>>>> That code is disabled since 2011 (6d83f94db95c ("genirq: Disable the
>>>>> SHIRQ_DEBUG call in request_threaded_irq for now"))? So, you had this
>>>>> without fake injection, I assume?
>>>>
>>>> No, I observed it only after enabling DEBUG_SHIRQ (to a kernel with
>>>> some debugging options already).
>>>
>>> Interesting. Maybe probe was deferred and you got the extra irq when
>>> deregistering?
>>
>> Yes, good catch. The abort happens right after deferred probe exit. It
>> could be then different reason than I thought - the interrupt is freed
>> through devm infrastructure quite late. At this time, the clock might
>> be indeed disabled (error path of probe()).
>From my point of view, the clocks are disabled as Oleksij pointed out, due to
RUNTIME_PM at the end of probe():
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
