On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 09:00:23PM +0800, dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Overall, there are several other calls to pm_runtime_get_sync within this
> > driver, would you like to fix them all at once ?
> >
>
> Sure, I will send a new patch to merge them all.
Thanks, you might want to add a Fixes: tag in your commit message as well.
>
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 03:05:07PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> > > pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> > > the call returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed
> > > on the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
> > > index 330ffed011e0..602cf35649c8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f7.c
> > > @@ -1767,8 +1767,10 @@ static int stm32f7_i2c_reg_slave(struct i2c_client *slave)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > > - if (ret < 0)
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> >
> > Considering that if we fail here there is a very good chance that this is due
> > to the resume failing, pm_runtime_put_noidle would probably make more sense
> > since pm_runtime_put_autosuspend will most probably fail as well.
> >
>
> Agree. Thank you for your advice!
>
> Regards.
> Dinghao
