On 2020-05-06 18:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 03:19:29PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> >> On 2020-05-06 14:42, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 02:51:49PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> Refactor pca954x_irq_handler() to: >>>> - use for_each_set_bit() macro >>>> - use IRQ_RETVAL() macro >>>> >>>> Above change makes code easy to read and understand. >>> >>> If there is no comments, Wolfram, can you apply this? >> >> Perhaps that's best, I have had the intention to get to this for a very long >> time and I'm very sorry for delaying. The number of patches for i2c-mux is so >> low that I have not bothered to automate the process, but that also means that >> I have to sort of rediscover how to do it a few times a year. It's simply not >> effective... >> >> Wolfram, I think it would be better if I just quit my i2c-mux tree and I >> instead review/ack patches that you then take. Would that be ok with you? >> >> Again, sorry for being a road-block. >> >> Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thank you, Peter! > > I hope this applies to the entire series? I'll reply individually now that there's a plan, this helps Wolfram's automation, I think. Cheers, Peter
