Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:50:29 +0200
Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20200427103553.GA24446@kunai>
References: <d2531fc1-b452-717d-af71-19497e14ef00@gmail.com> <a5198024-7273-74c4-b4f4-3a29d042bc36@nvidia.com> <f8fb1f7f-2497-033e-ff2c-c86c6caa9706@gmail.com> <fd1ca178-1ea3-851f-20a6-10bf00453ce3@nvidia.com> <a5734f19-254e-b6bc-e791-fa1ac63f11a4@gmail.com> <79f6560e-dbb5-0ae1-49f8-cf1cd95396ec@nvidia.com> <20200427074837.GC3451400@ulmo> <20200427084424.GA28817@kunai> <820200ce-17f3-18c0-6f79-3e582f45492d@gmail.com> <20200427103553.GA24446@kunai>
User-agent: Mutt/1.13.1 (2019-12-14)

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:35:53PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 12:07:19PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > 27.04.2020 11:44, Wolfram Sang пишет:
> > > 
> > >> Wolfram, can you revert the following two patches for v5.7, please?
> > >>
> > >> 	8814044fe0fa i2c: tegra: Synchronize DMA before termination
> > 
> > This patch has nothing to do with your trouble, why do you want to
> > revert it?
> 
> I'll wait some more before pushing out, so you can discuss it.

Okay, let me run a quick test with that second patch still applied to
make sure it really is harmless.

Thierry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Thierry Reding

References:
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Dmitry Osipenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Jon Hunter
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Dmitry Osipenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Jon Hunter
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Dmitry Osipenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Jon Hunter
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Thierry Reding
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Dmitry Osipenko
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
  - From: Wolfram Sang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] i2c: tegra: Better handle case where CPU0 is busy for a long time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux GPIO] [Linux SPI] [Linux Hardward Monitoring] [LM Sensors] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Media] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]