On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:07:25AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 4/24/2020 9:13 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> config I2C_BRCMSTB > >> tristate "BRCM Settop/DSL I2C controller" > >> - depends on ARCH_BRCMSTB || BMIPS_GENERIC || ARCH_BCM_63XX || \ > >> - COMPILE_TEST > >> + depends on ARCH_BCM2835 || ARCH_BRCMSTB || BMIPS_GENERIC || \ > >> + ARCH_BCM_63XX || COMPILE_TEST > > > > Isn't there something like ARCH_BROADCOM which we could use here instead > > of adding each and every SoC? > > If you are worried about this list growing bigger, I do not think this > is going to happen beyond this changeset (famous last words). Okay, thanks for the heads up. I wonder, then, if the description after 'tristate' is still accurate? But that withstanding, I am fine with this patch: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Let me know if I shall take this via I2C.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
