>>> Would you like to take another look at corresponding change possibilities? >>> >> yes, I want to do it and thanks for your info. How do you think about to improve the clarification around potentially “odd fixes” (because of collateral evolution)? I noticed your update suggestion “i2c: busses: convert to devm_platform_ioremap_resource”. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/20200409135224.7426-1-zhengdejin5@xxxxxxxxx/ https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1222122/ https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/9/431 It seems that you got encouraged to contribute changes according to another transformation approach by a single patch for a directory hierarchy. How likely is it that such adjustments touch source code places where related error messages would be found for further software development considerations? Would you like to wait until the integration of this update succeeded? Will it be interesting in the meantime to become more familiar with applications around scripts for the semantic patch language? Can the Coccinelle software make the discussed transformations more convenient also for your needs? Regards, Markus
