+cc: linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Moving /this/ to the linux-i2c list ;-) Thanks Wolfram, On 24/03/2020 10:27, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Maybe we should have a whole virtual I2C bus for virtual devices :-) >> >> (Hrm, that started out as a joke, and now I'm not sure if it's a real >> option or not...) > > Just one final thought: I think this is actually the best option. Zero > chance of address collisions (which could happen if you have a not > perfectly-described real HW bus). No RPM mangling of real and virtual > devices. A clear seperation what is real and what is virtual. Plus, you > can implement it right away, no need to wait for the dynamic address > assignment. Agreed - even better all round! But I presume we don't yet have a 'virtual' i2c bus? So it's a patch-set to do first? Or is it already feasible? I see references to 'i2c-virtual.c' and 'i2c-virt.c', but I can't find those files or any config options themselves... -- Regards -- Kieran
