On 11/06/2019 04:02 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Max, if you have a minute, could you test this (and the
> i2c_new_scanned_device conversion) on your HW? Would be much
> appreciated. Thanks!
[...snip...]
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-icy.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-icy.c
> index 07baa4d8de39..271470f4d8a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-icy.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-icy.c
> @@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ static int icy_probe(struct zorro_dev *z,
> struct fwnode_handle *new_fwnode;
> struct i2c_board_info ltc2990_info = {
> .type = "ltc2990",
> - .addr = 0x4c,
Thanks for catching this!
Looking at the I2C probe/scan code as well as i2c-icy, I see no reason for this to go wrong, so have an ACK from me.
I can test this tomorrow or on Friday if you insist, just not today. I've just set up my Amiga again.
Max
