On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:14:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:10:45PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > > Using cocciecheck to ensure there are no semantic issues in > > > i2c-qup driver. > > > > * This wording contains a typo. > > Doesn't matter to me for a cover letter as long as we can understand it. > > > * I would prefer to refer to a desired reduction of a few > > source code quality concerns. > > Not needed. I understand what is going on here. Markus - By "ensure", I mean there are no further cocciecheck issues at this point in time. And further, what changed is covered in individual patch changelog. So, I think this information is fine in cover. > > Can such a prefix be omitted? Can be, but I like to keep it. Thanks for review. -Saiyam
