Hi Vladimir, > I won't attend the LPC, however I would appreciate if you book some A pity. I would have liked to have you in the room. Let's see if we can get enough input from you via mail here. > time to review my original / alternative implementation of the TI > DS90Ux9xx I2C bridge device driver. We have only 45 minutes, this will not allow to review specific implementations. I want to give an overview of existing implementations with pros/cons... > The reasons why my driver is better/more flexible/more functional are > discussed earlier, please let me know, if you expect anything else > from me to add, also I would be happy to get a summary of your offline > discussion. ... and I'd appreciate support here from you, like your summary of the back then discussion (from where I can dive deeper if needed). Also, with Luca's new series we discussed some scenarios which can happen WRT to I2C address conflicts. Maybe you could comment on them, too? As I read the old thread, you have a hardcoded aliases using "ti,i2c-bridge-maps". This means you can't have own DTSI files for e.g. add-on modules, do I get this correctly? Regards, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
