Re: [PATCH] misc: eeprom: at24: support pm_runtime control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



czw., 29 sie 2019 o 04:04 Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
> Although in the most platforms, the power of eeprom and i2c
> are alway on, some platforms disable the eeprom and i2c power
> in order to meet low power request.
> This patch add the pm_runtime ops to control power to support
> all platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> index 35bf2477693d..2843e4b4aacd 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include <linux/nvmem-provider.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>
>  /* Address pointer is 16 bit. */
> @@ -68,6 +69,12 @@
>   * which won't work on pure SMBus systems.
>   */
>
> +static const char * const at24_supply_names[] = {
> +       "power", "i2c",
> +};
> +
> +#define AT24_NUM_SUPPLIES ARRAY_SIZE(at24_supply_names)
> +
>  struct at24_client {
>         struct i2c_client *client;
>         struct regmap *regmap;
> @@ -92,6 +99,8 @@ struct at24_data {
>
>         struct gpio_desc *wp_gpio;
>
> +       bool has_supplies;
> +       struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[AT24_NUM_SUPPLIES];
>         /*
>          * Some chips tie up multiple I2C addresses; dummy devices reserve
>          * them for us, and we'll use them with SMBus calls.
> @@ -663,6 +672,17 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>         at24->client[0].client = client;
>         at24->client[0].regmap = regmap;
>
> +       for (i = 0; i < AT24_NUM_SUPPLIES; i++)
> +               at24->supplies[i].supply = at24_supply_names[i];

Please, add a newline here.

> +       err =  devm_regulator_bulk_get(&at24->client[0].client->dev,
> +                                      AT24_NUM_SUPPLIES,
> +                                      at24->supplies);

This fits nicely in 80 chars - no need to break the line here again.

> +       if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> +               dev_err(dev, "Failed to get power regulators\n");

I assume you want to make the supplies optional by only returning on
EPROBE_DEFER, but why the error log then?

> +               return err;
> +       }
> +       at24->has_supplies = !err ? true : false;

Just a simple at24->has_supplies = !err is enough.

> +
>         at24->wp_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "wp", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>         if (IS_ERR(at24->wp_gpio))
>                 return PTR_ERR(at24->wp_gpio);
> @@ -705,13 +725,21 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>         /* enable runtime pm */
>         pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
>         pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> +       pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> +       if (at24->has_supplies) {
> +               err = regulator_bulk_enable(AT24_NUM_SUPPLIES, at24->supplies);

Unrelated to this patch, but I'm surprised we don't have optional
variants for bulk regulator operations.

> +               if (err) {
> +                       dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable power regulators\n");
> +                       return err;
> +               }
> +       }
>
>         /*
>          * Perform a one-byte test read to verify that the
>          * chip is functional.
>          */
>         err = at24_read(at24, 0, &test_byte, 1);
> -       pm_runtime_idle(dev);
> +       pm_runtime_put(dev);
>         if (err) {
>                 pm_runtime_disable(dev);
>                 return -ENODEV;
> @@ -726,15 +754,46 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
>  static int at24_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>  {
> +       struct at24_data *at24 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
>         pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
>         pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
> +       if (at24->has_supplies)
> +               regulator_bulk_disable(AT24_NUM_SUPPLIES, at24->supplies);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int __maybe_unused at24_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> +       struct at24_data *at24 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> +       if (at24->has_supplies)
> +               return regulator_bulk_disable(AT24_NUM_SUPPLIES,
> +                                             at24->supplies);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused at24_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> +       struct at24_data *at24 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> +       if (at24->has_supplies)
> +               return regulator_bulk_enable(AT24_NUM_SUPPLIES,
> +                                            at24->supplies);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(at24_pm_ops, at24_suspend, at24_resume);
> +
>  static struct i2c_driver at24_driver = {
>         .driver = {
>                 .name = "at24",
> +               .pm = &at24_pm_ops,
>                 .of_match_table = at24_of_match,
>                 .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(at24_acpi_ids),
>         },
> --
> 2.18.0
>

The rest looks good.

Bart




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux