(Found this mail in the offline draft folder of another laptop) > So, then the current approach of using subsys_initcall() can't be > changed easily, right now. But planned for the future (or at least > not introducing new caes). Yes. > But: how does that conflict w/ just moving the existing redundant > pieces into a helper macro ? The logic stays the same - just using > a shorter notation. (assuming my patch isn't buggy ;-)). It is not conflicting. My thinking is that such helpers, in general, scale better and are less error prone. But there is nothing to scale here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
