On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 08:04:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 03:28:58PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote: > > Bring the ACPI path in sync with the device tree path and handle all the > > IRQ fetching at probe time. This leaves the only IRQ handling at device > > registration time being that which is passed directly through the board > > info as either a resource or an actual IRQ number. > > > > It seems my comments weren't addressed by one or another reason. > This one I would rather to split with exporting function as a separate patch. > With the switch to passing in i2c_client it makes for some fairly awkward gymnastics and "ping pong" programming to do so. I guess we could leave the function taking in an acpi_device but just felt like a slightly less user friendly interface. Any thoughts? Thanks, Charles
